Hawaii’s Supreme Court is set to hear a case concerning whether Booking.com Inc. owes Hawaii the general excise tax on services it provides to hotels and other lodging providers on the island. The appeal follows a ruling by a state judge in 2023, who sided with Booking.com, stating the company does not owe the tax because it acts as an agent rather than a direct provider of lodging services.
The Hawaii Department of Taxation argues that Booking.com’s business model, which involves facilitating reservations for lodging establishments in exchange for commissions, constitutes taxable services under Hawaii law. The department contends that Booking.com is essentially providing a service to the lodging providers, and therefore, the commissions it earns should be subject to the state’s general excise tax.
Booking.com, on the other hand, asserts that it is merely an intermediary, connecting travelers with hotels. The company argues that it does not own or operate any hotels and does not directly provide the lodging services. Its role, according to Booking.com, is limited to advertising and reservation processing.
The core of the legal dispute revolves around the interpretation of Hawaii’s general excise tax, which applies to “gross proceeds” or “gross income” derived from business activities within the state. The state tax department believes that Booking.com’s revenue from commissions falls under this definition.
This case has broader implications for other online travel agencies and businesses that operate similarly in Hawaii and potentially other jurisdictions with similar tax structures. The outcome could set a precedent for how such intermediary services are taxed. The Hawaii Supreme Court’s decision will clarify the taxability of booking platform commissions and their role in the state’s tourism economy.
Key Points
Read the Complete Article.
